#POSTGRESQL VS SQL SERVER SOFTWARE#
#POSTGRESQL VS SQL SERVER WINDOWS#

Storage engines represent another area of extensibility to compare, and here MySQL offers more options than PostgreSQL.

Oracle, the owner of MySQL, has also shown off support for writing in other languages via the GraalVM interface, but this hasn't yet taken off and appears to be more of a demo than something you can use in production. For stored procedures, you're limited to SQL, while for UDFs you also have the option of writing them in C or C++ (or languages that can output shared libraries with 'C' linkages). In comparison, MySQL is much more limited when it comes to stored procedures and UDFs. One glaring omission from that list is support for the. You are also able to write stored procedures in C or languages that can output shared libraries with 'C' linkages (like Go, C++, D). But there is also third-party support for Java, Lua, JavaScript, Sh, Ruby, R, and although it pains me to say it, PHP as well. The core product supports PL/pgSQL (the PostgreSQL flavor of SQL), PL/Tcl, PL/Perl, and PL/Python (PL meaning Procedural Language). For instance, PostgreSQL allows for nearly any language to be used in the authoring of stored procedures and UDFs (User-Defined Functions). First Up: Extensibilityīoth PostgreSQL and MySQL allow developers to extend their database server in various ways, but that doesn't mean we're on a level playground here. The conclusion we draw is based on whether you are an ISV or enterprise developer. We will compare five key features important for business application developers and outline the strengths and weaknesses of each database in those areas. Really at this stage of the game, all major SQL databases meet these requirements, but to varying degrees. The database should be a seamless part of your application, not the demanding superstar.

#POSTGRESQL VS SQL SERVER WINDOWS#

But what we do care about are things like support, reliability, standards compliance, distributed workloads, and extensibility.įor business applications, whether they're thick clients like a Windows desktop application or a web-based application, having a stable, capable server that requires a minimal amount of fussing around is critical. This means that we don't care nearly as much about things like phpMyAdmin being more actively developed than phpPgAdmin or how many questions there are on stack overflow for MySQL vs.

#POSTGRESQL VS SQL SERVER SOFTWARE#

We're instead going to look at things from the standpoint of a business application developer, both independent software vendors (ISVs) and enterprise IT. Many of the articles out there look at this topic based on things like use in websites or the availability of tools. Well, we're going to take a different approach in this comparison. There are articles for beginners, exhaustive in-depth lists, and even an all-out fight video! So why does the internet need yet another MySQL vs. A search on Google will turn up plenty of articles comparing MySQL to PostgreSQL.

Postgresql vs sql server